Guitar Tuning RC 2: Jo Collinson Scott & Matthew Bannister
Researcher(s):
Publication Type: Abstract
Date Published:
Language: English
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.57874/1hpw-mp90
Click here to submit and read peer review
No peer review comments on this section yet.
Creative Use of Guitar Tuning Research Challenge
This is a research problem set using the 21st Century Music Practice Research Centre’s method: ‘Two Participant Online Practice Research Challenge: Collaborative Practice Exploration Through Video Exchange’. The research challenge format involves multiple practice researchers responding to the same problem or challenge to use a process of practical experimentation to explore that problem from a range of perspectives and musical styles and/or traditions. In this instance, the only stipulation was to “Think of an idea or approach for experimenting with tuning (either a strategy that you already use or something that you come up with for this challenge) – it could be for song writing, part-writing / arranging or something less specific like exploring different timbres”. The ten research practitioners who engaged in this challenge were put into five pairs and there are, therefore, five publications in each of the Rationale / Hypothesis, Results / Sources and Analysis categories. The Creative Use of Guitar Tuning Research Challenge sits as a sub-problem within two streams of research problems set by the 21st Century Music Practice Research Centre. The first is The Influence of Technology on Musical Instruments & Their Use which itself sits within the larger Technology & Musical Creativity research project. The second is Extended Techniques & Performance which sits within the Creative Strategies for Musical Practice research project.
Researcher(s):
Publication Type: Research Problem
Date Published: 23rd Mar 2026
Language: English
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.57874/zs3f-ag50
Click here to submit and read peer review
No peer review comments on this section yet.
Rationale / Hypothesis
In the format for the C21MP Research Challenge the Rationale / Hypothesis section consists of the proposals by the practice research participants that outlines their initial ideas and approach.
Jo Collinson Scott’s initial proposal
My plan is to experiment with a version of ukelele tuning where the bottom four strings are tuned as E A C# F# and the top two left as B and E. I can then use some ukulele fingerings on the bottom four strings and leave the higher strings open. Usually I use open tunings on the guitar to lose myself so that I don’t know what I’m doing. I find that a productive method as I’m not really a guitarist, so I specifically aim to not know what I’m doing. I just want to come to the guitar with my ear and not think about what chord I’m playing or what should come next. I’m a songwriter and I primarily play the guitar in order to write song material so I’ll be thinking of what I’m doing on the guitar, not as an instrumental part, but as a potential accompaniment to a vocal line. Therefore I might experiment with a vocal line as well as we go along. I would like to disrupt my lyric writing process in the same way the tuning will disrupt my guitar playing and I’ve been researching rhetorical devices to aid with that process.
Matthew Bannister’s initial proposal
Less is more – guitar tunings with minimal changes as a compositional tool
The 1980s Dunedin Sound in New Zealand was marked by guitar chord voicings that used the open strings of the instrument to create sonority and continuity, filling out sound via pedal notes, drawing on 60s folk-rock jangle and the drone of early art-rock (the Velvet Underground). Many Dunedin composers (recording for Flying Nun Records) used open tunings, for example the Verlaines (“Pyromaniac” EADGAE) or Sneaky Feelings (“Backroom” DADDAD). As the writer of the latter, I have continued to use open tunings as a compositional tool, to defamiliarise the fret board and arrive at novel chord voicings.
I propose that “less is more” and that detuning only one string can achieve novel sounds (also a more practical strategy for live settings). For example, I used a “dropped G” tuning (EGDGBE) on “Favourite Clown” and “It All Comes Right In The End” (The Changing Same 2018). In the present project I propose to use a similar tuning (EADF#BE) to write a new song. (All tracks available on Spotify.)
Researcher(s):
Publication Type: Rationale / Hypothesis
Date Published:
Language: English
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.57874/38fs-3q61
Click here to submit and read peer review
No peer review comments on this section yet.
Method
This protocol establishes a structured method for collaborative practice research between two music practitioners through asynchronous video exchange. Participants independently develop proposals and create 10-minute videos exploring a practice concept, technique, or approach. Videos are exchanged, prompting each participant to create a second 10-minute response exploring how their partner’s work stimulates new directions in their own practice. The process concludes with a 20-minute filmed discussion analysing interpretative choices and outcomes. The protocol produces a 60-minute structure, serving as peer-reviewed, DOI-allocated practice research output via JISC Octopus. This method makes tacit practice knowledge explicit and generates transferable insights into practice innovation.
For further details see: https://doi.org/10.57874/s80m-1g18
Researcher(s):
Publication Type: Method
Date Published: 19th Jun 2026
Language: English
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.57874/s80m-1g18
Click here to submit and read peer review
No peer review comments on this section yet.
Results / Sources - Coming Soon
Researcher(s):
Publication Type: Results / Sources
Date Published:
Language: English
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.57874/1hpw-mp90
Click here to submit and read peer review
No peer review comments on this section yet.
Analysis - Coming Soon
Researcher(s):
Publication Type: Analysis
Date Published:
Language: English
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.57874/1hpw-mp90
Click here to submit and read peer review
No peer review comments on this section yet.
Interpretation - Coming Soon
Researcher(s):
Publication Type: Interpretation
Date Published:
Language: English
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
DOI:
Click here to submit and read peer review
No peer review comments on this section yet.
Applications / Implications - Coming Soon
Researcher(s):
Publication Type: Applications / Implications
Date Published:
Language: English
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
DOI:
Click here to submit and read peer review
No peer review comments on this section yet.
Technology and Musical Creativity / The Influence of Technology on Musical Instruments and Their Use / Creative Use of Guitar Tuning Research Challenge / Guitar Tuning 2: Jo Collinson Scott & Matthew Bannister
Position in the Centre's Structure
Technology & Musical Creativity
Creative Use of Guitar Tuning Research Challenge
Guitar Tuning 2: Jo Collinson Scott & Matthew Bannister
Main Researchers
Summary
Coming Soon
Research Problem
Rationale / Hypothesis
Method
Results / Sources
Analysis
Interpretation
Applications / Implications
Peer Review
Rationale / Hypothesis
In the format for the C21MP Research Challenge the Rationale / Hypothesis section consists of the proposals by the practice research participants that outlines their initial ideas and approach.
Jo Collinson Scott’s initial proposal
My plan is to experiment with a version of ukelele tuning where the bottom four strings are tuned as E A C# F# and the top two left as B and E. I can then use some ukulele fingerings on the bottom four strings and leave the higher strings open. Usually I use open tunings on the guitar to lose myself so that I don’t know what I’m doing. I find that a productive method as I’m not really a guitarist, so I specifically aim to not know what I’m doing. I just want to come to the guitar with my ear and not think about what chord I’m playing or what should come next. I’m a songwriter and I primarily play the guitar in order to write song material so I’ll be thinking of what I’m doing on the guitar, not as an instrumental part, but as a potential accompaniment to a vocal line. Therefore I might experiment with a vocal line as well as we go along. I would like to disrupt my lyric writing process in the same way the tuning will disrupt my guitar playing and I’ve been researching rhetorical devices to aid with that process.
Matthew Bannister’s initial proposal
Less is more – guitar tunings with minimal changes as a compositional tool
The 1980s Dunedin Sound in New Zealand was marked by guitar chord voicings that used the open strings of the instrument to create sonority and continuity, filling out sound via pedal notes, drawing on 60s folk-rock jangle and the drone of early art-rock (the Velvet Underground). Many Dunedin composers (recording for Flying Nun Records) used open tunings, for example the Verlaines (“Pyromaniac” EADGAE) or Sneaky Feelings (“Backroom” DADDAD). As the writer of the latter, I have continued to use open tunings as a compositional tool, to defamiliarise the fret board and arrive at novel chord voicings.
I propose that “less is more” and that detuning only one string can achieve novel sounds (also a more practical strategy for live settings). For example, I used a “dropped G” tuning (EGDGBE) on “Favourite Clown” and “It All Comes Right In The End” (The Changing Same 2018). In the present project I propose to use a similar tuning (EADF#BE) to write a new song. (All tracks available on Spotify.)
Information
Publication Type: Rationale / Hypothesis
Date Published: 23/02/2026
Language: English
Licence: CC BY 4.0
DOI:
Peer Review:
Results / Sources & Analysis
Information
Publication Type: Results / Sources and Analysis
Date Published: 23/02/2026
Language: English
Licence: CC BY 4.0
DOI:
Peer Review: